Share:


BEHAVIORAL INTENTION OF SMARTWATCH USAGE - AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS USING UNIFIED THEORY OF ACCEPTANCE AND USE OF TECHNOLOGY (UTAUT) MODEL

    S Rajesh, Dr. Kavitha Shanmugam, Dr. Ilankadhir M

Abstract

Purpose: Technology-driven insurance companies use disruptive technologies to innovate, improve, and automate their products and services. With the help of connected devices, especially wearable, health insurance companies can access the customers’ risk profile, customize suitable products, and charge premiums based on the physical activities of the customer tracked with the help of smartwatches. Customers consider several factors before using a Smartwatch. The current research is undertaken to determine the factors that determine the usage of the Smartwatch. Theoretical framework: This study has employed the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) with Trust as an extended variable to determine the influence of variables on behavioral intention while also discussing the explanatory power (R square) and effect size (f square) of the model. UTAUT also tests the moderating effect of Gender on behavioral intention. Design/methodology/approach: A Survey was conducted among the general population over eighteen years of age and using the smartwatch. The sample size was 131 and the responses were collected through a structured questionnaire. All the items of the constructs were measured on a five-point Likert scale and responses were quantified. Variance-based Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) using Smart PLS (version 4.0) is used to test and validate the model. Findings: From the results, it is inferred that performance expectancy and Trust significantly affect behavioral intention, while effort expectancy, facilitating conditions, and social influence don't. Research, Practical & Social implications: The study will create awareness in society about the importance of staying healthy to prevent or minimize the impact of non-communicable diseases by tracking physical activities using a Smartwatch. Insurance companies can customize fitness-based products, provide a discount on premiums, and pass on other benefits to customers. Insurance companies can leverage this technology to create health awareness among the general public improve profit and reduce claims. Originality/value: The data was analyzed using Smart PLS (version 4.0) software by measuring the measurement and structural models. From the path coefficients, it is inferred that performance expectancy and Trust significantly affect behavioral intention. R square value indicates the proposed model has a medium explanatory power in explaining the behavioral intention. f square value indicates that performance expectancy and trust have a moderate effect on the behavioral intention of using the smartwatch.

Keyword : Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT); Smartwatch; Behavioral Intention; Trust; Non Communicable diseases (NCDs);

Published in Issue
February 15, 2024
Abstract Views
02
PDF Downloads
03
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References


Apeksha Shah, Dr. Swati Ahirrao, Dr. Shraddha Phansalkar, Dr. Ketan Kotecha (2021). Survey on: Applications of Smart Wearable Technology in Health Insurance, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2021. Singhal A, Cowie MR (2020) . The Role of Wearables in Heart Failure. Curr Heart Fail Rep.Aug;17(4):125-132. PMID: 32494944; PMCID: PMC7343723.(Pubmed) Alaiad, Ahmad and Lina Zhou. (2004). The determinants of home healthcare robots adoption: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Medical Informatics 83, no. 11: 825-840. Ama Henry Ebubedike, Tara Ahmed Mohammed, Syriac Nellikunnel, Tan Seng Teck. Factors influencing consumer’s behavioral intention towards the adoption of mobile payment in Kuala Lumpur. International Journal of Professional Business Review. Miami, v.7, n. 6, p. 01 -20, e0584, 2022. Aswin C Prakash, Manoj Kumar Pandey, Manoj Pareek (2021). Wearables Technology: Awareness, Adoption and Applications in Indian Health Insurance Industry. Turkish Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation 32(3): 34060-83 A. Bhattacharjee (2000). Acceptance of e-commerce services: the case of electronic brokerages, in IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 411-420. Bianchi, C., Tuzovic, S. and Kuppelwieser, V.G. (2023). Investigating the drivers of wearable technology adoption for healthcare in South America. Information Technology & People, Vol. 36 No. 2, pp. 916-939. Chenming Peng, Nannan Xi, Hong Zhao, Juho Hamari (2022). Acceptance of Wearable Technology: A Meta-Analysis. Proceedings of the 55th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2022. Çiçek, Mesut. (2015). Wearable Technologies and its Future Applications. International Journal of Electrical, Electronics and Data Communication. 3. 2320-2084. Chao C-M (2019). Factors Determining the Behavioural Intention to Use Mobile Learning: An Application and Extension of the UTAUT Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 446627 Chen, Chiau-Ching & Shih, Hsu-Shih. (2014). A Study of the Acceptance of Wearable Technology for Consumers-An Analytical Network Process Perspective. The International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Washington, D.C. Zhongwei Gu & June Wei (2020). Empirical Study on Initial Trust of Wearable Devices Based on Product Characteristics, Journal of Computer Information Systems, 61:6, 520-528. Diego Soliño-Fernandez, Alexander Ding, Esteban Bayro-Kaiser and Eric L. Ding (2019). Willingness to adopt wearable devices with behavioral and economic incentives by health insurance wellness programs. Results of a US cross-sectional survey with multiple consumer health vignettes. Ewilly J.Y. Liew, Santha Vaithilingam & Mahendhiran Nair (2014) Facebook and socio-economic benefits in the developing world. Behaviour & Information Technology, 33:4, 345-360 Gopinath, Krishnan; Selvam, Gowthaman; Narayanamurthy, Gopalakrishnan (year). Determinants of the Adoption of Wearable Devices for Health and Fitness: A Meta-analytical Study. Communications of the Association for Information Systems (forthcoming), In Press. Gu, D., Khan, S., Khan, I. U., Khan, S. U., Xie, Y., Li, X., & Zhang, G. (2021). Assessing the Adoption of e-Health Technology in a Developing Country: An Extension of the UTAUT Model. SAGE Open. A. Godfreya, V. Hetherington,c, H. Shuma, P. Bonatod, N.H. Lovelle, S. Stuart. (2018). From A to Z: Wearable technology explained. International Journal of midlife health and beyond. Pubmed, Epub 2018 Apr 25. PMID: 29903647. Hp.com. HP Tech Takes. https://www.idc.com/promo/wearablevendor https://www.investopedia.com/terms/w/wearable-technology.asp#:~:text=Wearable%20technology%2C%20also%20known%20as,even%20tattooed%20on%20the%20skin. Kranthi, A.K. and Asraar Ahmed, K.A. (2018). Determinants of smartwatch adoption among IT professionals – an extended UTAUT2 model for smartwatch enterprise. Int. J. Enterprise Network Management, Vol. 9, Nos. 3/4, pp.294–316. Liu C-H, Chen Y-T, Kittikowit S, Hongsuchon T and Chen Y-J (2022). Using Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology to Evaluate the Impact of a Mobile Payment App on the Shopping Intention and Usage Behavior of Middle-Aged Customers. Frontiers in Psychology, 13:830842. Lee E-J (2020). Impact of visual typicality on the adoption of wearables. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. 1–14. https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/wearable-electronics-market-983.html Madhav Sharma, David Biros (2019). Building Trust in Wearables for Health Behavior. Journal of the Midwest Association for Information Systems. (JMWAIS): Vol. 2019: Iss. 2, Article 3. Michael Greineder, Tobias Riasanow, Markus Böhm and Helmut Krcmar (2018). The Generic InsurTech Ecosystem and its Strategic Implications for the Digital Transformation of the Insurance Industry. Lecture Notes in Informatics (LNI), Gesellschaft für Informatik, Bonn 2018 Martins, C., Oliveira, T., & Popovič, A. (2014). Understanding the Internet banking adoption: A unified theory of acceptance and use of technology and perceived risk application. International Journal of Information Management, 34(1), 1-13. Patil, P., Tamilmani, K., Rana, N. P., & Raghavan, V. (2020). Understanding consumer adoption of mobile payment in India: Extending Meta-UTAUT model with personal innovativeness, anxiety, Trust and grievance redressal. International Journal of Information Management, 54, 102144. Papa, A., Mital, M., Pisano, P., & Del Giudice, M. (2020). E-health and wellbeing monitoring using smart healthcare devices: An empirical investigation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153, 119226, ScienceDirect Lee E-J (2020). Impact of visual typicality on the adoption of wearables. Journal of Consumer Behaviour (IF 3.199);1–14. Nosica Rizkalla, Elissa Dwi Lestari, Norashida Othman, Leylawati Joremi, Boby Arinto. Elucidating the factors affecting entrepreneurs’ intention to adopt social media in their business: A perspective from Indonesia. International Journal of Professional Review. Miami, v.8, n.5, p. 01-21, e01413, 2023 Pobee, Frederick & Opoku, Daniel. (2018). The Moderating Effects of Gender on E-Commerce Systems Adoption Factors. International Journal of Strategic Decision Sciences, 9. 86-104. Phaik Khee Beh, Yuvaraj Ganesan, Mohammad Iranmanesh & Behzad Foroughi (2019). Using smartwatches for fitness and health monitoring: the UTAUT2 combined with threat appraisal as moderators, Behaviour & Information Technology. Ramkumar, B. and Liang, Y. (2020). How do smartwatch price and brand awareness drive consumer perceptions and purchase intention? A perceived value approach. International Journal Technology Marketing, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp.154–180. Chenming Peng, Nannan Xi, Hong Zhao, Juho Hamari (2022). Acceptance of Wearable Technology: A Meta-Analysis. Proceedings of the 55th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2022. Shweta Nanda & Bhupender K Som (2018). A Study of the Awareness of Wearable Medical Devices in India: A Potential Market Perspective. Journal of Business Theory and Practice. Vol. 6, No. 2, 2018 Shahla Asadi, Rusli Abdullah, Mahmood Safaei and Shah Nazir (2019). An Integrated SEM-Neural Network Approach for Predicting Determinants of Adoption of Wearable Healthcare Devices. Hindawi. A Spender, C. Bullen, L. Altmann-Richer, J. Cripps, R. Duffy, C. Falkous, M. Farrell, T. Horn, J. Wigzell and W. Yeap (2018). Wearables and the Internet of things: considerations for the life and health insurance industry. British Actuarial Journal, 24. Arvind Singhal1 & Martin R. Cowie (2020). The Role of Wearables in Heart Failure. Singhal A, Cowie MR. (2020). The Role of Wearables in Heart Failure. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2020 Aug;17(4):125-132. PubMed, PMID: 32494944; PMCID: PMC7343723. https://www.techtarget.com/searchmobilecomputing/definition/wearable-technology Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. Vasumathi Palaniswamy, Krishna Raj. Social Media Marketing Adoption by Agriculturists; A TAM based study. International Journal of Professional Business Review. Miami, v.7, n.3, p.01-14, e0537, 2022. Venkatesh, Viswanath, James Y. L. Thong, and Xin Xu. “Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology.” MIS Quarterly 36, no. 1 (2012): 157–78. Venkatesh, Viswanath and Thong, James Y.L. and Xu, Xin, Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: A Synthesis and the Road Ahead (May 1, 2016). Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 17, No. 5 (2016), pp. 328–376. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases Yang Q, Al Mamun A, Hayat N, Salleh MFM., Jingzu G, Zainol NR (2022) Modelling the mass adoption potential of wearable medical devices. PLoS ONE 17(6): e0269256